Difference between revisions of "Agency Practice Act"

From acus wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Agency Regulations)
(Agency Regulations)
Line 39: Line 39:
 
*Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection ([https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=cc7528a75a628746634101ed8b4ce3f1&mc=true&node=se12.9.1081_1107&rgn=div8 12 C.F.R. § 1081.107])
 
*Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection ([https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=cc7528a75a628746634101ed8b4ce3f1&mc=true&node=se12.9.1081_1107&rgn=div8 12 C.F.R. § 1081.107])
 
*Commodity Futures Trading Commission
 
*Commodity Futures Trading Commission
**([https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=ee7357c045a882bfaa0883c590988dc6&mc=true&node=se17.1.10_111&rgn=div8 17 C.F.R. § 10.11])
+
**Appearance in adjudicatory proceedings ([https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=ee7357c045a882bfaa0883c590988dc6&mc=true&node=se17.1.10_111&rgn=div8 17 C.F.R. § 10.11])
**([https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=ee7357c045a882bfaa0883c590988dc6&mc=true&node=pt17.1.14&rgn=div5 17 C.F.R. Part 14])
+
**Rules Relating to Suspension or Disbarment from Appearance and Practice ([https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=ee7357c045a882bfaa0883c590988dc6&mc=true&node=pt17.1.14&rgn=div5 17 C.F.R. Part 14])
 
*Consumer Product Safety Commission ([https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=24b1d6b48433f1b81ac1d8c70d14d6ad&mc=true&node=sp16.2.1025.g&rgn=div6 16 C.F.R. Part 1025, Subpt. G])
 
*Consumer Product Safety Commission ([https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=24b1d6b48433f1b81ac1d8c70d14d6ad&mc=true&node=sp16.2.1025.g&rgn=div6 16 C.F.R. Part 1025, Subpt. G])
 
*Drug Enforcement Administration (Justice)
 
*Drug Enforcement Administration (Justice)

Revision as of 10:20, 28 September 2018

5 U.S.C. § 500 (2012), originally enacted November 8, 1965, by Pub. L. No. 89-332, 79 Stat. 1281; incorporated into the U.S. Code by Pub. L. No. 90-83, 81 Stat. 195 (September 11, 1967) (with minor stylistic changes); amended by Pub. L. No. 106-113, Div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [Title IV, § 4732(b)(2)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-583.

Overview

The Agency Practice Act provides that an attorney in good standing in any state may represent persons before federal agencies. An agency may require an attorney to file a written declaration of current qualification and to state that he is authorized to represent the particular person before the agency. Similarly, a duly qualified certified public accountant may represent persons before the Internal Revenue Service. The Act was intended to prohibit agency established admission requirements for licensed attorneys and special enrollment requirements for CPAs. (Note: The Patent and Trademark Office is exempted from the Act. ) The Act expressly neither grants nor denies other persons the right to practice before an agency, nor does it authorize or limit an agency’s right to discipline or disbar persons practicing before it.

In 1982, the Administrative Conference adopted a statement on discipline of attorneys practicing before federal agencies. After studying agency concerns and existing disciplinary procedures, the Conference concluded that any current problems concerning attorney discipline before federal agencies were not of such magnitude or so widespread as to require legislative action or the adoption of uniform federal standards.

Legislative History

In 1957 the Department of Justice recommended discontinuing the practice of many agencies that required attorneys to apply for agency acceptance as practitioners. Several bills were introduced in the early 1960s to abolish agency admission requirements. By 1965, few agencies retained admission requirements, and only the Treasury Department and the Patent Office objected to discontinuing them. (See House Judiciary Committee Report, cited below.) Pub. L. No. 89-332 was enacted in 1965 with the passage of S. 1758.

In 1999, the Act was amended to substitute “Patent and Trademark Office” for “Patent Office.”

Source Note

The House report on S. 1758 is reprinted in U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News. Professor Michael Cox’s 1982 report to the Administrative Conference discusses federal agency attorney discipline and contains an extensive bibliography.

Also relevant is section 9 (“Use of Nonattorneys”) of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act.

Bibliography

Legislative History

  • Report to Accompany S. 1758, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, S. Rep. No. 755, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. (1965).
  • Report to Accompany S. 1758, House Committee on the Judiciary, H.R. Rep. No. 1141, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. (1965).

Administrative Conference Documents

Books and Articles

  • Craig H. Allen, Attorney Ethics and Agency Practice: Representing Clients in Coast Guard Marine Casualty Investigations, 22 J. Mar. L. & Com. 225 (1991).
  • American Bar Association, Report to the House of Delegates on Federal Agency Attorney Discipline (August 1982).
  • Michael P. Cox, Regulation of Attorneys Practicing Before Federal Agencies, 34 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 173 (1984).
  • Roberta S. Karmel, Rule 2(e)—A Reprise, 210 N.Y .L.J. 3 (1993).
  • Melanie B. Leslie, Government Officials as Attorneys and Clients: Why Privilege the Privileged?, 77 Ind. L.J. 469 (2002).
  • Nicholas M. Wenner, Comment, Determining Secondary Liability under Securities Laws: Attorney Beware!, 11 Hamline L. Rev. 61 (1988).

Agency Regulations

Statutory Provisions

Agency Practice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 500 (2012).